Issues
Combined Reporting
Maryland Chamber Position
The Maryland Chamber of Commerce opposes combined reporting. This legislation needlessly interrupts the thoughtful strategy enacted by the General Assembly at the 2007 special session, which provides for data collection and analysis, a study commission to evaluate business taxes, and follow-up action by the General Assembly at the conclusion of the study.
Current law requires corporations doing business in the state to be taxed based on their payroll, property and sales in Maryland. Combined reporting arbitrarily assigns income to Maryland for all members of a corporate unitary group – even for those corporate entities having no presence in the state.
The Chamber has opposed combined reporting legislation for a number of years. States that have adopted combined reporting have found that it results in massive shifts of tax liability between businesses, with many paying more taxes and many paying less. We believe it’s important to analyze the winners and losers of such a tax change and the impact on Maryland’s economy.
Priority Bills
- SB 354, Corporate Income - Combined Reporting - Pension Sustainability Trust Fund
Maryland Chamber Bill Page
Maryland Chamber Position Statement (PDF)
Maryland General Assembly Bill page - HB 10, Teacher and Employee Pension Sustainability and Solvency Trust Fund
Maryland Chamber Bill Page
Maryland Chamber Position Statement (PDF)
Maryland General Assembly Bill page - HB 584, Corporate Income Tax - Combined Reporting
Maryland Chamber Bill Page
Maryland Chamber Position Statement (PDF)
Maryland General Assembly Bill page
Position
The Maryland Chamber opposes combined reporting because it would place Maryland businesses at a competitive disadvantage. None of Maryland’s competitor states have enacted a combined reporting tax system. Such a system adds significant complexity and requires additional staff resources among businesses reporting the tax, as well as the Comptroller’s Office in auditing and litigating the tax. In addition, combined reporting will produce winners and losers among Maryland taxpayers, with some businesses paying more, others less.
We believe this year's legislation needlessly interrupts the thoughtful strategy enacted by the Maryland General Assembly in 2007, when it established a study commission to collect data and study business taxes in Maryland.
From the Blog
- Chamber Opposes Combined Reporting
- Bill Would Extend “Millionaires’ Tax” and Enact Combined Reporting
Combined Reporting News
- Bill that goes after corporate tax payments introduced in state Senate
The Gazette - The combined reporting switcheroo
The Daily Record - Tax panel gives thumbs-down to combined reporting
The Gazette - Commission votes to leave corporate tax unchanged
Baltimore Sun - New session, same issues
The Gazette
